Sex and Ethnic Differences in Career Decision Self-Efficacy: The Comparison between Mentawai, Kutai, Lombok, Palu, and Papua Youths
Abstract
Career Decision Self-Efficacy (CDSE), which reflects an individual's confidence in making effective career decisions, is influenced by various factors, particularly sex and ethnicity. This quantitative, non-experimental cross-sectional study aims to compare CDSE levels among young men and women from five ethnic groups in Indonesia: Mentawai, Kutai, Lombok, Palu, and Papua. The study involved 75 participants, 38 males and 37 females—who completed the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale–Short Form (CDSES-SF), which demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.901). The results revealed gender-based differences in CDSE dimensions. Male participants scored highest in goal selection (M = 4.79, SD = 0.66) and lowest in planning for the future (M = 4.48, SD = 0.67). In contrast, female participants showed the highest score in occupational information (M = 4.74, SD = 0.61) and the lowest in problem solving (M = 4.43, SD = 0.82). Ethnic differences were also observed. The lowest scoring CDSE dimensions varied: occupational information for Mentawai (M = 4.32, SD = 0.61) and Palu (M = 4.24, SD = 0.43); planning for the future for Kutai (M = 3.70, SD = 0.81) and Papua (M = 3.37, SD = 0.56); and goal selection for Lombok (M = 3.57, SD = 0.88). Based on these findings, it is recommended that counselors provide group or classical guidance and career-focused counseling/psychotherapy to help students strengthen CDSE dimensions where scores remain low, thereby supporting informed and confident career decision-making.
Downloads
References
Betz, N. E., Klein, K. L., & Taylor, K. M. (1996). Evaluation of a short form of the Career decision-making self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(1), 47-57.
Chao, R. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111–1119.
Creed, P., Patton, W., & Prideaux, L. (2006). Causal relationship between career indecision and career decision-making self-efficacy. Journal of Career Development, 33(1), 47-65.
Creswell, J. (2015). Riset pendidikan perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan evaluasi riset kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Gati, I., & Saka, N. (2001). High school students' career-related decision-making difficulties. Journal of Counseling and Development, 79, 331–340.
Guay, F., Senecal, C., Gauthier, L., & Fernet, C. (2003). Predicting career indecision: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(2), 166-177.
Gushue, G. V., & Whitson, M. L. (2006). The relationship among support, ethnic identity, career decision self-efficacy, and outcome expectations in African American high school students: Applying social cognitive career theory. Journal of Career Development, 33, 112-125.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.
Koumoundourou, G., Tsaousis, I., & Kounenou, K. (2011). Parental influences on Greek adolescents' career decision-making difficulties: The mediating role of core self-evaluations. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 165–182.
Kunnen, E. S., Sappa, V., van Geert, P. L., & Bonica, L. (2008). The shapes of commitment development in emerging adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 15, 113–131.
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (1996). A social cognitive approach to career development: An overview. The Career Development Quarterly, 44, 310- 321.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Brenner, B., Chopra, S. B., Davis, T., Talleyrand, R., & Suthakara, V. (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science education options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 474-483.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H., & Treistman, D. (2003). Relation of the contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 458-465.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Sheu, H., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B. R., Gloster, C. S., & Treistman, D. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: Utility for women and students at historically Black universities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 84-92.
Rusandi, M. A., Liza, L. O., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2023). Change destiny: constructing unexpected career opportunities to improve work ability and reduce depression due to work–family conflicts. Journal of Public Health, 45(1), e157-e158. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdac082
Salim, R. M. A., Putri, N. K., Rumalutur, N. A., Situmorang, D. D. B., & Mujiati, S. (2024). The Influence of Social Support on Career Adaptability as Mediated by Core Self-Evaluation in Undergraduate Students from the Provinces of Papua and West Papua. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 46(4), 771-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-024-09564-1
Sawitri, D. R. (2009). Pengaruh status identitas dan efikasi diri keputusan karier terhadap keraguan mengambil keputusan karier pada mahasiswa tahun pertama di Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 5 (2).
Sawitri, D. R., Creed, P. A., & Zimmer‐Gembeck, M. J. (2015). Longitudinal relations of parental influences and adolescent career aspirations and actions in a collectivist society. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(3), 551-563.
Situmorang, D. D. B. (2019). Pengaruh parenting styles terhadap career decision self-efficacy melalui thinking styles: Perbandingan antara siswa laki-laki dan perempuan. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Magister Sains Psikologi Pendidikan, Universitas Indonesia, Depok. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20482457&lokasi=lokal
Situmorang, D. D. B., & Salim, R. M. A. (2021). Perceived parenting styles, thinking styles, and gender on the career decision self-efficacy of adolescents: how & why?. Heliyon, 7(3). e06430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06430
Situmorang, D. D. B. (2024). Implementation of Sex Education in Indonesia: A "Sine Qua Non" in Taboo. Buletin Psikologi, 32(1), 10 -112. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.95836
Swerdlik, M. E., & Cohen, R. J. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Sovet, L., & Metz, A. J. (2014). Parenting styles and career decision-making among French and Korean adolescents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(3), 345-355.
Taylor, K. M., & Betz, N. E. (1983). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of vocational behavior, 22(1), 63-81.
Trusty, J. (1998). Family influences on educational expectations of late adolescents. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 260–270.
Vignoli, E., Croity-Belz, S., Chapeland, V., De Fillipis, A., & Garcia, M. (2005). Career exploration in adolescents: The role of anxiety, attachment, and parenting style. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 153–168.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dominikus David Biondi Situmorang, Magdalena Palang Lewoleba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution that allows the sharing of articles published with the acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this magazine.
2) The authors are authorized to make additional contracts separately for distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in an institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), as long as there is recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as it increases the impact and reference of the published work.
